Grade Level and Unit: Grade 4, Math Unit 4 (Geometry)
Investigation 2
|
Session
Description of Lesson Tasks: “Guess My Rule”
Classifying characteristics of polygons
|
Materials
Needed:
-shape cards
-paper plates with center cut
out (large circles)
-“Rule” cards
-Recording worksheet
|
Grouping
Decisions:
Whole group review (under 5 min.) > Pairs (block
time) > Whole group
|
Learning
Goal(s) & Essential Question(s)
How can we group polygons?
All
students will be able to describe and classify two-dimensional figures.
Objectives
1.
All students will be able to define polygons as
closed figures with line segments (sides) and vertices.
2.
All students will be able to classify polygons by
attributes including: number of sides, length of sides, and size of angle.
3.
All students will develop vocabulary to describe attributes
and properties of polygons.
|
Language
Objectives
All students will be come familiar with the meaning of
the following mathematical terms, through direct, explicit instruction.
All students will use these terms appropriately and in
context.
¨ Side
¨ Angle
¨ Acute
angle
¨ Obtuse
angle
¨ Right
angle (90°)
¨ Parallel
¨ Perpendicular
¨ Concave
All students should already have familiarity with the
following terms:
¨ Polygon
|
MA
Frameworks:
MATHEMATICS
Geometry 4.G
Draw and identify lines and angles, and classify shapes
by properties of their lines and angles.
2. Classify two-dimensional figures based on the
presences or absence of parallel or perpendicular lines, or the presence or
absence of angles of a specified size.
|
Connect
and Anticipate:
Today we are going to play another round of Guess
My Rule, this time with new shapes and new rules. Before we start can someone
remind the class what a polygon is?
One of the rules you are going to see includes a
word you might have not seen before.
“Concave” is written on
the white board.
When a shape is concave, it has at least one side
that bends inward.
Here are two shapes.
![]() ![]()
Two shapes, a rectangle
and a concave pentagon, are drawn on the white board.
Is this first shape concave? What about this second shape?
Every time you or your partner figure out what a
rule is you can both record the rule and the polygons on pg 22.
|
Implementation
Focus
Questions/Hook/Launch:
Each pair will get one set of shape cards and one
set of rule cards and one circle.
Start by having one partner pick and rule and choose two polygons that
fit that rule. Place those
two polygons inside the circle.
Pick at least one polygon that does not fit the rule and place
it outside the circle.
Explore:
Every time you or your partner figure out what a
rule is you can both record the rule and the polygons on pg 22.
Various teachers circled
the room to assist students who were stuck, help introduce vocabulary, etc.
Summary:
Let’s talk about what we learned during this
round of Guess My Rule. I heard
a lot of new vocabulary used when folks were grouping together polygons to
match a rule. Would anyone like
to share what he or she found?
Students introduced new
vocabulary used in the lesson.
The following words were written on the white board.
-acute
angle
-right
angle/90° angle
-obtuse
angle
-parallel
-concave **written earlier in lesson
Parallel lines… I heard there’s a song to help
remember what parallel lines and what another special pair of lines are.
Students stand at their
desks and sing (repeat-after-me).
“Mr. Perpendicular…”
One arm goes above your
head, the other arm perpendicular
“…is very particular,
and always making things right,
Not like Mrs. Parallel…”
Both arms go straight up
above head, creating two parallel lines
“…falling down the endless well…”
Both arms fall in front of your body, staying
parallel
“…whose lines will never meet.”
|
Evidence: The following checklist
was in my notebook as I went around, working one-on-one and checking in on
pairs.
I also have artifacts (worksheets) where there work is
recorded to further fill in or cross-reference the short hand data collected
below during the lesson.
|
Pseudonyms
|
Can accurately classify
polygons by:
|
Using vocab previously known or introduced to them?
|
||
# of sides?
|
length of sides?
|
angle size?
|
||
John
|
w/ prompting
|
|||
George
|
||||
Eddie
|
Ö
|
|||
Leila
|
Needs improvement
|
|||
Hector
|
Ö
|
X/Ö - groups angles
|
||
Reese
|
Ö
|
|||
Uri
|
Recognized quadrilaterals
with all sides different
|
|||
Benji
|
||||
Lawrence
|
X -> Ö
|
Ö - worked closely with teacher
|
||
Tyler
|
Ö
|
X
|
||
Simon
|
Ö
|
X
|
||
Carl
|
Ö
|
|||
Nora
|
Knew it.
|
|||
Kyle
|
X -> Ö
|
Ö - worked closely with teacher
|
||
Differentiated
Instruction
ELL
Preview vocabulary such as
“side” and “angle”.
IEP/modification/accommodation
Extension
|
Notes
and Reflections
I was pretty excited to actually have a checklist
prepared to gather evidence, but was surprised at how little I was actually
able to collect. I feel
confident in my assessment in that it contains evidence for each learning
target. In the future, I think I could take this a step
further by making clear exactly what I am looking for to check off that a
student has met each of those targets.
I can see that this checklist/rubric might not exactly be clear to
someone at first glance, although at the time of the lesson I had it pretty
clear in my head as to what I was doing and what I was assessing.
I felt like most if not all students benefited from the
vocabulary instruction, in the explicit instruction at the beginning of the
lesson, the one-on-one implicit instruction during partner work, and the
follow-up summary song. Although
their progress is not necessarily documented in the checklist, it can be seen
in student work and the vocabulary was present during the summary and in lessons
since.
I felt pretty strong in my preparation of this
lesson. I had all the materials
ready to go, and partnerships already decided. Fortunately, this class is largely made of kinesthetic
learners who benefited from the song and dance as well as being able to manipulate
and touch the objects.
As far as differentiated instruction goes, I definitely
feel as though this is an area I need improvement on. With a special education teacher in
the classroom it’s almost unnecessary to plan ahead for the IEP students
knowing she will be there to jump in and differentiate. Furthermore, since I haven’t had a
chance to really thoroughly review all IEPs, I’m not even a thousand percent
sure what is mandated or recommended to go for their specific
disabilities. I think this is an
area I need more strength and practice in.
|



No comments:
Post a Comment